Featured Articles
Gift For Pet Ideas That Are Very Cheap
There are some great gift for pet ideas out there, and they are sure to be hit with your pet. Just remember that if you don’t keep the personality of your pet in mind when you buy, they could be less than thrilled and perhaps even indifferent to what you have gotten for them. [...]
How to get rid of your pimples?
Tips to get rid of pimples: There are many ways that you can get rid of pimples. If you are tired of that acne and sick of options that don’t work, consider Exposed Skin Care. You can look for natural products as well – they are less likely to cause negative side effects to occur [...]
; ?>
 |
|
|
Discover just how some people are making big money on the Internet so easily it's almost untrue.Bookmark Us !
New Earth Warming Cycle: Humankind Could Cease to Exist |
 |
 |
 |
|
Even Scientists Don't Agree. Anywhere that theory goes, disagreement is bound to follow. Any set of facts can be interpreted differently, as the theories of global warning prove. According to Merriam Webster Dictionary, two of the definitions of the word theory include:
There are many "facts" about the earth's atmospheric changes; many scientists believe we are experiencing the start of a warming cycle that could change the climate so dramatically that humankind would cease to exist. Other scientists, using the same data, draw vastly different theories: the atmosphere is experiencing a harmless blip in its natural and normal cycle and that humans only minimally affect the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. There is vast evidence on both sides of the argument, and there seems to be very little middle ground. Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth" and Spencer R. Whert's "The Discovery of Global Warming" came to the forefront in warning us about global warming; Fred Singer, former Chief Scientist with the US Weather Program and Professor Wilfred Beckerman, former member of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution are just a few of the scientist who view the data from the opposite angle. There are innumerable articles, papers and books that support both sides of the global warning issue. The only common ground in these opposing camps seems to be that the data fails to back enough years to be absolutely indisputable, and that, as good as they are, computers cannot model nature. |